Coinbase Donates Bitcoin to Refugees in its 12 Days of ...

12-19 09:22 - 'Coinbase Announces $10,000 Bitcoin Donation to Syrian Refugees in Greece' ( by /u/PatchyLove removed from /r/Bitcoin within 58-68min

Coinbase Announces $10,000 Bitcoin Donation to Syrian Refugees in Greece
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: PatchyLove
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

I started a project using Bitcoin to help refugees in Greece earn a living & dignity by producing organic T-shirts, I need help! /r/Bitcoin

I started a project using Bitcoin to help refugees in Greece earn a living & dignity by producing organic T-shirts, I need help! /Bitcoin submitted by HiIAMCaptainObvious to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

I started a project using Bitcoin to help refugees in Greece earn a living & dignity by producing organic T-shirts,… - Crypto Insider Info - Whales's

Posted at: April 3, 2018 at 07:27PM
I started a project using Bitcoin to help refugees in Greece earn a living & dignity by producing organic T-shirts,…
Automate your Trading via Crypto Bot :
Join Telegram Channel for FREE Crypto Bot: Crypto Signal
submitted by cryptotradingbot to cryptobots [link] [comments]

04-03 17:03 - 'I started a project using Bitcoin to help refugees in Greece earn a living & dignity by producing organic T-shirts, I need help!' (self.Bitcoin) by /u/munikho removed from /r/Bitcoin within 234-244min

Hi Reddit! For the past two years I've been living in Greece and worked in different refugee camps. Now I decided to try to change the situation around by starting my own project producing organic T-shirts with refugees.
Since it is difficult to open your own bank account in Greece (especially for refugees) I'm researching if it's possible to pay all the employees with bitcoin. Because with crypto something which used to be difficult, could become very easy. But first I need to get the project off the ground and so I enabled bitcoin payments for the crowdfunding, which was super easy to implement:
I heard about "Pine" and the Pineapple Fund, but sadly enough the application process is closed. But I'm hoping there are more bitcoin enthusiasts out there that want to help make a project like this happen.
Some background info: After doing mostly emergency aid (providing food, clothes, etc...) for refugees in Greece I noticed something else was needed. Because lots of refugees are stuck in camps, without an opportunity for them to get back on their own feet in this new country. Especially since Greece is still in an economic crisis. I've seen lots of people get depressed, get addicted to alcohol or drugs, etc... also because some of them are dealing with a trauma of losing family and friends.
I started to play around with some ideas (cookie factory, children toys) and then realised something with clothes might work. Many Syrian refugees used to work as tailors and Greece has cotton fields and lots of textile production facilities. So I figured that maybe if I combine those two I might be able to create something which benefits both.
It's a bit scary since I have no previous experience at all in this, I actually barely buy clothes myself!
To get it all started I'm planning to produce 1000 T-shirt and from there build it into a sustainable business. Hopefully employing tons of refugees, producing different products and create an opportunity for people to earn a living and develop.
And, hoping that by using bitcoin I can overcome some of the challenges that you can call 'greek bureaucracy'.
Any ideas, feedback are welcome!
Thanks! Maarten Hunink
I started a project using Bitcoin to help refugees in Greece earn a living & dignity by producing organic T-shirts, I need help!
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: munikho
1: not**actory*co*/
Unknown links are censored to prevent spreading illicit content.
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

Crypto Banking Wars: Can Non-Custodial Crypto Wallets Ever Replace Banks?

Crypto Banking Wars: Can Non-Custodial Crypto Wallets Ever Replace Banks?
Can they overcome the product limitations of blockchain and deliver the world-class experience that consumers expect?
This is the second part of Crypto Banking Wars — a new series that examines what crypto-native company is most likely to become the bank of the future. Who is best positioned to reach mainstream adoption in consumer finance?
While crypto allows the world to get rid of banks, a bank will still very much be necessary for this very powerful technology to reach the masses. As we laid out in our previous series, Crypto-Powered, we believe companies that build with blockchain at their core will have the best shot at winning the broader consumer finance market. We hope it will be us at Genesis Block, but we aren’t the only game in town.
So this series explores the entire crypto landscape and tries to answer the question, which crypto company is most likely to become the bank of the future?
In our last episode, we offered an in-depth analysis of big crypto exchanges like Coinbase & Binance. Today we’re analyzing non-custodial crypto wallets. These are products where only the user can touch or move funds. Not even the company or developer who built the application can access, control, or stop funds from being moved. These apps allow users to truly become their own bank.
We’ve talked a little about this before. This group of companies is nowhere near the same level of threat as the biggest crypto exchanges. However, this group really understands DeFi and the magic it can bring. This class of products is heavily engineer-driven and at the bleeding-edge of DeFi innovation. These products are certainly worth discussing. Okay, let’s dive in.

Users & Audience

These non-custodial crypto wallets are especially popular among the most hardcore blockchain nerds and crypto cypherpunks.
“Not your keys, not your coins.”
This meme is endlessly repeated among longtime crypto hodlers. If you’re not in complete control of your crypto (i.e. using non-custodial wallets), then it’s not really your crypto. There has always been a close connection between libertarianism & cryptocurrency. This type of user wants to be in absolute control of their money and become their own bank.
In addition to the experienced crypto geeks, for some people, these products will mean the difference between life and death. Imagine a refugee family that wants to safely protect their years of hard work — their life savings — as they travel across borders. Carrying cash could put their safety or money at risk. A few years ago I spent time in Greece at refugee camps — I know first-hand this is a real use-case.
Or imagine a family living under an authoritarian regime — afraid that their corrupt or oppressive government will seize their assets (or devalue their savings via hyperinflation). Citizens in these countries cannot risk putting their money in centralized banks or under their mattresses. They must become their own bank.
These are the common use-cases and users for non-custodial wallets.

Products in Market

Let’s do a quick round-up of some of the more popular products already in the market.
Web/Desktop The most popular web wallet is MetaMask. Though it doesn’t have any specific integration with DeFi protocols yet, it has more than a million users (which is a lot in crypto land!). Web wallets that are more deeply integrated with DeFi include InstaDapp, Zerion, DeFi Saver, Zapper, and MyCrypto (disclosure: I’m an investor and a big fan of Taylor). For the mass market, mobile will be a much more important form-factor. I don’t view these web products as much of a threat to Genesis Block.
Mobile The more serious threats to Genesis Block are the mobile products that (A) are leveraging some of the powerful DeFi protocols and (B) abstracting away a lot of the blockchain/DeFi UX complexity. While none get close to us on (B), the products attempting this are Argent and Dharma. To the extent they can, both are trying to make interacting with blockchain technology as simple as possible.
A few of the bigger exchanges have also entered this mobile non-custodial market. Coinbase has Wallet (via Cipher Browser acquisition). Binance has Trust Wallet (also via acquisition). And speaking of acquisitions, MyCrypto acquired Ambo, which is a solid product and has brought MyCrypto into the mobile space. Others worth mentioning include Rainbow — well-designed and built by a small indy-team with strong DeFi experience (former Balance team). And ZenGo which has a cool feature around keyless security (their CEO is a friend).
There are dozens of other mobile crypto wallets that do very little beyond showing your balances. They are not serious threats.
Hardware Wallets Holding crypto on your own hardware wallet is widely considered to be “best practice” from a security standpoint. The most popular hardware wallets are Ledger, Trezor, and KeepKey (by our friends at ShapeShift). Ledger Nano X is the only product that has Bluetooth — thus, the only one that can connect to a mobile app. While exciting and innovative, these hardware wallets are not yet integrated with any DeFi protocols.


Let’s take a look at some of the strengths with non-custodial products.
  1. Regulatory arbitrage Because these products are “non-custodial”, they are able to avoid the regulatory burdens that centralized, custodial products must deal with (KYC/AML/MTL/etc). This is a strong practical benefit for a bootstrapped startup/buildedeveloper. Though it’s unclear how long this advantage lasts as products reach wider audiences and increased scrutiny.
  2. User Privacy Because of the regulatory arbitrage mentioned above, users do not need to complete onerous KYC requirements. For example, there’s no friction around selfies, government-issued IDs, SSNs, etc. Users can preserve much of their privacy and they don’t need to worry about their sensitive information being hacked, compromised, or leaked.
  3. Absolute control & custody This is really one of the great promises of crypto — users can become their own bank. Users can be in full control of their money. And they don’t need to bury it underground or hide it under a mattress. No dependence, reliance or trust in any third parties. Only the user herself can access and unlock the money.


Now let’s examine some of the weaknesses.
  1. Knowledge & Education Most non-custodial products do not abstract away any of the blockchain complexity. In fact, they often expose more of it because the most loyal users are crypto geeks. Imagine how an average, non-crypto user feels when she starts seeing words like seed phrases, public & private keys, gas limits, transaction fees, blockchain explorers, hex addresses, and confirmation times. There is a lot for a user to learn and become educated on. That’s friction. The learning curve is very high and will always be a major blocker for adoption. We’ve talked about this in our Spreading Crypto series — to reach the masses, the crypto stuff needs to be in the background.
  2. User Experience It is currently impossible to create a smooth and performant user experience in non-custodial wallets or decentralized applications. Any interaction that requires a blockchain transaction will feel sluggish and slow. We built a messaging app on Ethereum and presented it at DevCon3 in Cancun. The technical constraints of blockchain technology were crushing to the user experience. We simply couldn’t create the real-time, modern messaging experience that users have come to expect from similar apps like Slack or WhatsApp. Until blockchains are closer in speed to web servers (which will be difficult given their decentralized nature), dApps will never be able to create the smooth user experience that the masses expect.
  3. Product Limitations Most non-custodial wallets today are based on Ethereum smart contracts. That means they are severely limited with the assets that they can support (only erc-20 tokens). Unless through synthetic assets (similar to Abra), these wallets cannot support massively popular assets like Bitcoin, XRP, Cardano, Litecoin, EOS, Tezos, Stellar, Cosmos, or countless others. There are exciting projects like tBTC trying to bring Bitcoin to Ethereum — but these experiments are still very, very early. Ethereum-based smart contract wallets are missing a huge part of the crypto-asset universe.
  4. Technical Complexity While developers are able to avoid a lot of regulatory complexity (see Strengths above), they are replacing it with increased technical complexity. Most non-custodial wallets are entirely dependent on smart contract technology which is still very experimental and early in development (see Insurance section of this DeFi use-cases post). Major bugs and major hacks do happen. Even recently, it was discovered that Argent had a “high severity vulnerability.” Fortunately, Argent fixed it and their users didn’t lose funds. The tools, frameworks, and best practices around smart contract technology are all still being established. Things can still easily go wrong, and they do.
  5. Loss of Funds Risk Beyond the technical risks mentioned above, with non-custodial wallets, it’s very easy for users to make mistakes. There is no “Forgot Password.” There is no customer support agent you can ping. There is no company behind it that can make you whole if you make a mistake and lose your money. You are on your own, just as CZ suggests. One wrong move and your money is all gone. If you lose your private key, there is no way to recover your funds. There are some new developments around social recovery, but that’s all still very experimental. This just isn’t the type of customer support experience people are used to. And it’s not a risk that most are willing to take.
  6. Integration with Fiat & Traditional Finance In today’s world, it’s still very hard to use crypto for daily spending (see Payments in our DeFi use-cases post). Hopefully, that will all change someday. In the meantime, if any of these non-custodial products hope to win in the broader consumer finance market, they will undoubtedly need to integrate with the legacy financial world — they need onramps (fiat-to-crypto deposit methods) and offramps (crypto-to-fiat withdraw/spend methods). As much as crypto-fanatics hate hearing it, you can’t expect people to jump headfirst into the new world unless there is a smooth transition, unless there are bridge technologies that help them arrive. This is why these fiat integrations are so important. Examples might be allowing ACH/Wire deposits (eg. via Plaid) or launching a debit card program for spend/withdraw. These fiat integrations are essential if the aim is to become the bank of the future. Doing any of this compliantly will require strong KYC/AML. So to achieve this use-case — integrating with traditional finance —all of the Strengths we mentioned above are nullified. There are no longer regulatory benefits. There are no longer privacy benefits (users need to upload KYC documents, etc). And users are no longer in complete control of their money.

Wrap Up

One of the great powers of crypto is that we no longer depend on banks. Anyone can store their wealth and have absolute control of their money. That’s made possible with these non-custodial wallets. It’s a wonderful thing.
I believe that the most knowledgeable and experienced crypto people (including myself) will always be active users of these applications. And as mentioned in this post, there will certainly be circumstances where these apps will be essential & even life-saving.
However, I do not believe this category of product is a major threat to Genesis Block to becoming the bank of the future.
They won’t win in the broader consumer finance market — mostly because I don’t believe that’s their target audience. These applications simply cannot produce the type of product experience that the masses require, want, or expect. The Weaknesses I’ve outlined above are just too overwhelming. The friction for mass-market consumers is just too much.
The winning bank will be focused on solving real user problems and meeting user needs. Not slowed down by rigid idealism like censorship-resistance and absolute decentralization, as it is with most non-custodial wallets. The winning bank will be a world-class product that’s smooth, performant, and accessible. Not sluggish and slow, as it is with most non-custodial wallets. The winning bank will be one where blockchain & crypto is mostly invisible to end-users. Not front-and-center as it is with non-custodial wallets. The winning bank will be one managed and run by professionals who know exactly what they’re doing. Not DIY (Do It Yourself), as it is with non-custodial wallets.
So are these non-custodial wallets a threat to Genesis Block in winning the broader consumer finance market, and becoming the bank of the future?
No. They are designed for a very different audience.
Other Ways to Consume Today's Episode:
Follow our social channels:
Download the app. We're a digital bank that's powered by crypto:
submitted by mickhagen to genesisblockhq [link] [comments]

Article for local paper, some feedback would be helpful

The Importance of Bitcoin: The purpose of this article is to inform you on the arguments made for bitcoin and how those arguments relate to growth of bitcoin since it’s inception.
To set the premise I like the comparison of Bitcoin to the English language. It is spoken globally, and is useful in communication. It can be translated to other languages, or currencies. The English language like Bitcoin also has no central authority. No President or CEO of the English Language, it is a good we can use or not use as we please. The value of the English language comes from many speakers of the language, similar to adoption and bitcoin value.
Becoming a reality in late 2008, bitcoin was born. Bitcoin is network of computers that agree on a public ledger. Within this network is contained a currency recorded in the ledger. New bitcoin is created by way of computers competing to solve the balance changes and maintaining security of the ledger. This network of computers is the first to complete instantaneous, trust-less and basically free transfers of money globally, 24/7, and without anyone’s permission. This is the brief.
Money itself has no value. We attribute value to it based on the goods and services we can receive for it. Money must have certain characteristics in order to be a good form of money. These are things we all inherently understand but rarely are concerned with improving on.
Durability: Money shouldn’t break down. Uniformity: Does one shell = one shell? Divisibility: Half a chicken doesn’t work, see durability. Limited Supply: If it isn’t scarce it doesn’t have value. Portable: Cards are easier than gold coins. Store of Value: Saving shouldn’t mean a loss of value Acceptability: Do you take bitcoin? No, why would I?
Currently, people rely on governments to control and create their currency. This has worked well and under this system we have achieved some long-sustained growth. With flaws though, the average fiat currency lifespan is about 22 years. Evidenced in recent memory by hyperinflation in Venezuela and Zimbabwe or Greece’s debt crisis or in 2016 when India deemed all 500 and 1,000 Rupees notes not viable as currency. Fiat currencies are also often inflationary, equating to, loss of purchasing power over time. (USD June 2018 Inflation Rate 2.87%) For example, $100 in 2000 equals $146 now. Discouraging for savers who see less than 2% return on their money in the bank. Furthermore, being run centralized means they are susceptible to human error or abuse. Another obviously is the geographic constraints of a government currency.
So how does Bitcoin play into the currency sphere. Currency is market of competition. People choose the currency that best suits their needs. Now, every currency in the world has to compete with Bitcoin. These are the characteristics that Bitcoin has that give it a competitive advantage.
First, Bitcoin exists. It cannot be stopped, short of shutting down the internet worldwide. This is due to its decentralized nature, there is no central authority and has value as long as there are two participants who prefer it to other competitors. Anyone with an internet connection and the most basic phone can participate. Trust-less: For the first-time wealth can transferred great distance without a third party. Western Union and MoneyGram are not needed. This has the added benefit of reducing the frictional cost of sending money by eliminating middle-men. Even payment processors can cost business’s 1-2% of their revenue when you use credit or debit cards.
Uncensored: Bitcoin is decentralized, this means it exists without a gatekeeper or central authority. You do not have to ask permission to use your money. Instead, you are your own bank. Much like cash doesn’t require permission to be spent, neither does bitcoin. This makes it useful for illicit activity but in general means freedom for your money. In 2010, the US government pressured Visa and Mastercard to stop American citizens from supporting Wikileaks, asymmetric political censorship. Furthermore, your account cannot be frozen or funds stolen from you. Valuable to anyone living under an oppressive regime. To be put simply, a refugee could carry his life savings in his head.
Accountability: Next, we must remember this is a public ledger. This means we can eliminate fraud and abuse of all types. Recently, the public ledger was used as evidence against 12 Russians involved in our elections. So, while it provides the freedom of money that criminals like, it also leaves behind a trail for investigators to follow. The applications of financial transparency are easy recognizable, political campaigns, government spending and perfect accounting for any business.
Decentralization of money creation: Anyone can become a miner or buy mining contracts to be involved in the creation of new bitcoin. Creation of new bitcoin is the mechanism that incentives the integrity of the ledger. The supply of bitcoin is mathematically metered such that by roughly 2140 there will be no more bitcoin created. Roughly 21 million in total.
Perfect Scarcity: The crux of the bitcoin argument is that for the first time we can achieve perfect and verifiable scarcity and have every property that makes money, good money. Supply and demand governs the price of goods, and money is the only good that buys all goods and services. Demand for money is ever persistent and growing. Supply of bitcoin is limited. The US dollar has decreasingly bought less bitcoin over time and bitcoin has bought increasingly more US dollars over time. The difference is the global citizenry beginning to agreeing that savers should be rewarded instead of punished. A deflationary currency. The vast majority of people do not receive income raises that out-compete the cost of inflation. Saving wealth used to be a viable and risk-free option for the poor to achieve financial prosperity.
Bitcoin’s growth comes from people using it for any of the above reasons. Remember Bitcoin is only 10 years old. As people use it for whatever they wish it starts to retain wealth. As it retains wealth, it becomes a viable store of value like gold, these factors all work in tandem to grow bitcoin over time. Add in some irrational exuberance and we hit 20k. Two key takeaways are, bitcoin will continue to exist for the short-medium term and as long as it provides an alternative for someone it will hold value.
submitted by jhurtford to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Why the New Zealand government should sanction the creation of a national NZ blockchain dollar to run in tandem with the NZ fiat dollar.

White paper April 29, 2017
The problem: No country today has a national currency built on the new digital-cryptographic-blockchain. This innovative architecture is a prerequisite to engaging with blockchain economic activity which is nascent but burgeoning at the present time.
Blockchain technology, among other things, allows a currency to expand its capabilities beyond what we currently understand a currency to be i.e. a mechanism to transfer intrinsic value. Fiat-based currencies are the incumbent format. Although fiat is now mostly digitised, its architecture is not cryptographic by design, thus rendering it largely unusable within these new emerging economies.
The native state of a cryptographic blockchain currency is in cryptographic digital format; it does not have a physical equivalent as fiat does. This white paper is an overview explaining why this currency is different, why it is needed and how to implement it.
Preamble: There is growing recognition within the fintech (financial technology) community that emerging cryptographic blockchain currencies will be a major disruptive technology. They can be permissioned or permissionless.
Permissionless means they can be created and used without-permission or restriction and they do not recognise borders. They are freely available to any citizen from any country. They’re normally publicly issued with a fixed supply and/or with a predictable inflation rate. No bank or government will have had a hand in issuing them; nor do they control them. Paradoxically permissionless currencies hold real value, albeit unofficially.
A permissioned currency is normally issued and controlled by a government or bank and used by that nation for economic activity. All fiat currencies are permissioned currencies. Currently there is no permissioned cryptographic blockchain currency issued by any government anywhere in the world.
One of the purposes of this paper is to position blockchain cryptographic currencies as the next logical step in the evolution of money.
Blockchain cryptographic currencies, in the broader sense i.e. permissioned or permissionless is a nascent yet powerful new technology which very few people are yet aware of. With a permissionless blockchain currency, any person, group or company can now create their own digitally secure currency-type token to transfer value within and across borders. One of the advantages of cryptographic architecture is that it offers unbreakable anti-counterfeiting security along with the ability to firmly fix the monetary supply. This means no individual or government has the ability to arbitrarily tamper with it. It can be changed only through consensus by the majority of its users. This is in contrast to the current permissioned fiat system where additional money creation can and is arbitrarily created by less than one tenth of one percent of its users i.e. the banking industry and government regulators. The vast majority of users within the fiat system have been indirectly shut out of the process that determines when and how much additional money should be created. Monetary creation more recently renamed quantitative easing has the effect of directly devaluing all currency in circulation and all savings held by individuals.
There is a growing concern for the health of the world’s financial system due to high levels of unprecedented quantitative easing taking place throughout the world today. This has exacerbated an era of protracted low interest rates and historic high levels of debt. In the West, the poor and middle-classes are bearing the brunt of the effects of quantitative easing. Interest rates paid on savings or earnings held in bank accounts are at historical lows, and in real terms are returning negative capital growth. Savers and earners are experiencing the devaluation effect as their money purchases less and less of fundamental asset and service necessities like housing, education and health. For this group of citizens, this reality will become a very powerful incentive to move surplus earnings or savings away from a highly devaluing fiat system and into a permissionless blockchain currency that offers a fixed, stable monetary supply.
What exactly is a blockchain currency? Broadly speaking, the architecture of a blockchain currency is based on digital cryptography. This makes it secure when transferring over the internet. Digital fiat architecture is not cryptographic, making it unsecure to use over the internet.
Digital blockchain currencies have an important commonality with physical fiat cash. When I take a physical $20 note out of my physical wallet or a digitised $20 blockchain currency out of my digital wallet, and transfer it to you, both our wallet balances are updated immediately without an intermediary being involved i.e. no bank. In both cases your balance rises by $20 and mine declines by $20. This type of simple person-to-person value-transfer and simultaneous balance-update with physical fiat currency or digital blockchain currency is impossible with digital fiat currency. Digital fiat must have a bank to act as intermediary between us. It is the bank that actually makes the transfer between us and it is the bank that updates each of our bank balances (usually overnight).
So as to remove all doubt, a physical fiat currency and a digital blockchain currency do not require a bank to act as intermediary when transferring to someone else. This is a powerful, yet unobvious concept to grasp. The ramifications of this statement of fact is far reaching, yet little understood by the average person.
The problem with fiat: Fiat currency has a quasi-symbiotic relationship around ownership and control, shared between a government and banks. It is a marriage of convenience rather than one of choice. Regulation and oversight is supposed to be controlled by government, but in this marriage, an unhealthy imbalance has grown over time that has put the banking industry in a much stronger position as to how money is created and controlled. This imbalance in power has come into existence as a result of new levels of modern debt issuance. Most developed and all undeveloped countries are in some measure deeply indebted to the banking industry, whether the debt be government or private. Total worldwide debt levels are now so high it is unlikely to ever be repaid. When you owe a bank a lot of money they have much more control over how things should be run.
Physical fiat was digitised with the invention of the computer and before the invention of the internet. Digitised fiat consists of two parts the digital currency itself, and the digital infrastructure used to move it around. Before the internet, the banking institution created this digital system to enable their users (every bank account holder) to transfer value between each other. It’s a proprietary closed system (in other words it does not use or currently need the internet). There are no competitors and every user must have a bank account. We all have no option but to use this system. Lack of competition has allowed it to become antiquated, with very little innovation to improve its overall functionality. It is expensive to keep it going, and without genuine competition, price gouging is suspected on the fees charged to users for just about every aspect of its use.
The fiat system is also filled with friction. For example, it’s slow and very expensive to perform international remittances. There are fees to convert the currency and then more fees to send that currency on. It can take anything from 3-5 business days to receive an international payment. Payment-associated transactions like credit cards and PayPal also attract expensive fees.
A state change is upon us: The blockchain currency has arisen with the ubiquitous penetration of the internet and its ownerless yet persistent state (always on). The internet has grown and emerged as the predominant superhighway to transfer all types of digital information. Physical postal-service mail was the first major industry that was disrupted by this new superhighway due to the invention of email. Today, most legacy infrastructure that supports telephony, radio, movies and television has been disrupted to some degree. These industries are shifting ever larger parts of their data transmission over to the internet because an ever-growing number of their users are using the internet as the preferred portal to access their digital data requirements. Private siloed and permissioned legacy infrastructures are in rapid decline. With the invention of the blockchain, transfer-of-value directly over the internet is now possible. The banking industry’s siloed fiat system is perhaps the last and most important private legacy infrastructure to be disrupted by the internet.
With the blockchain, being willing to incur a “cross-border payment” while suffering up to a 5-day wait becomes as unthinkable as sending a “cross-border email” that is expected to take 5 days to arrive.
Blockchain currency conversions are relatively frictionless and virtually instantaneous (less than 1 hour in most cases), and transactions fees (if any) are also considerably lower. Paying an expensive fee to send your blockchain payment locally or internationally makes about as much sense as paying a fee to your internet provider to send an email locally or internationally.
The internet has thoroughly penetrated the fabric of modern society for all things digital, one of the most notable being ecommerce. From around 1995 the demand from users to participate in commerce via the internet grew exponentially, and this in turned forced the banking industry to bring their private siloed system closer to the new superhighway in an effort to meet its users’ ever-growing demands for digital convenience via the internet. This has now expanded to include online banking and payment systems (Visa/MasterCard). However, it is important to note the fiat banking system plugs into or sits on top of the internet. It is still separate and is unable to integrate in a safe and secure way with the internet the way a blockchain currency does.
So today the fiat system has a competitor that has the potential to genuinely disrupt its singular monopoly. Blockchain technology has become a game-changer. We are no longer forced to use only government/banker-issued fiat currency to store value; nor are we forced to use the banking system to transfer it. We can now store our value in a public decentralised currency (a blockchain currency) and use a public decentralised system (the internet) to transfer it to others.
The current state of blockchain currencies: Cryptographic blockchain currencies are at a very nascent stage. They are not a separate technology to the internet, but rather a major enhancement or upgrade to the internet’s ongoing evolution. Cryptographic blockchain currencies therefore inherit the genetic or core fundamentals of the internet right down to the protocol level. Arguably, the most important of these attributes is the decentralised state of the internet. The internet is the rails that a blockchain currency is transferred around on. It is not owned by the banks or controlled by a government. This means high fees are unlikely to be ever charged since a “level playing field” or a “neutral worldwide rails system” is now in place. This is a similar state of affairs to when Skype was created. International phone calls through Skype suddenly became very cheap or free. As a direct result, toll call charges from incumbent Telcos plummeted all around the world. The Telcos’ siloed telephone system faced extinction. They had to lower prices to compete with services being offered by the likes of Skype to stay in business. And it was the ownerless state of the internet as the underlying rail system that brought this about.
There are only permissionless (non-government/bank) blockchain currencies in existence today. The first permissionless blockchain currency was Bitcoin, created in 2009. It was a technological experiment that has been highly successful and has proved that currency movements over the internet can be safely and securely performed without a banking system. It comes with a fixed money supply of 21 million coins, and it’s the resultant scarcity this creates that makes it extremely valuable. One bitcoin at time of writing is worth around $1300 USD. No government, dictatorship or banking institution was involved in its creation or deployment. Its value is autonomous and is derived solely from what its users believe it is worth. There are now over 500 permissionless blockchain currencies available today.
Permissionless currencies are only one (and the first) product that a blockchain can be used for. They can also be used in other new and innovative ways not possible with fiat. Micro payments, escrow, and multi-signature transactions are some examples where blockchain currencies are far superior. In addition, there are other functionalities not specific to finance that are possible using blockchains and which are much more secure and unforgeable, such as proof of identity (like a passport), ownership transference (like vehicles and homes), and democratic voting systems. Hundreds of non-currency blockchain products are being worked on now and many thousands more are likely in the future. However these developments are outside the scope of this paper.
Why a government should support this technological innovation: Blockchain products and new economic communities are under development. They can be accessed or used only via a blockchain cryptographic currency. Currently there is no permissioned or government-created one. Electronic fiat is unusable within these environments because its architecture is not cryptographic. It must be converted to a currency that is cryptographic before its intrinsic value can be utilised. On this basis alone, a risk for government is the economic exclusion of fiat in these new economies. Users will be forced to sidestep the fiat system for no other reason than these new economies can only function or be used with a currency that has cryptography built into its design i.e. a blockchain currency. To ensure a country’s national currency remains relevant to these emerging new economies, its currency must be made available in a blockchain format.
In the near future, it is this author’s view that most countries will need to convert at least part of their fiat currency over to a blockchain architecture. This means two different architectures for the same currency for example, NZ dollar fiat and NZ dollar blockchain. It is simply a matter of when a government recognises that electronic value-transference will be moved (in part or wholly) to the internet, thus breaking away from the current banking industry’s siloed fiat system. It also means the beginnings of the disintermediation of banks since blockchain currencies do not require them. A tough reality that the banking institutions are currently grappling with.
Bitcoin has proven that creating or digitising a currency (or digitising a value asset) to store value is no longer the privileged purview of banking consortiums or even governments. Permissioned systems based on fiat is not the future. Total domination of currency creation and value transference by the banking industry and governments is ending.
Why this technological innovation will grow with or without government sanction: Once the blockchain becomes the accepted standardised architecture for currencies, some governments and banks will be unable to surreptitiously devalue their currency without serious repercussions from its users because those users can easily abandon it as a store of value. This in effect is what we have now, albeit nascent. Citizens who live in economies like Brazil, India and Greece are now storing a growing percentage of their savings in non-government-created cryptographic currencies in the knowledge that it’s secure (it cannot be arbitrarily confiscated and access cannot be shut down), it will maintain its value much better than the official fiat currency, 24-hour access is guaranteed via their mobile phones, and it can be moved to any location in the world that has internet access. Their wealth will easily follow them wherever they go. Being a refugee will no longer necessarily mean you have no access to your savings irrespective of the country that takes them in.
Blockchain currencies will enable users to exchange and hold their savings in many different currencies (permissioned or permissionless) with very little friction. Sending and simultaneously switching one type of currency to another will be as seamless as sending an email from an Apple Mac, Android phone, Windows PC etc. to any other device anywhere in the world.
This new technology – as was the case for the internet in the early days – will be largely ignored by everyone until suddenly we all find ourselves using and relying on it in our daily lives.
The architecture of a solution: In the future, it is likely that a mix of fiat and blockchain currencies will coexist for a time. Governments and the banking industry will create and control the official fiat and the official permissioned blockchain national currency, while permissionless blockchain currencies (or currency-like tokens) will be created by various members of the public (worldwide) to achieve or enhance their specific economic goals.
There are blockchain solutions suitable for permissioned government-issued cryptographic currencies. These solutions will enable governments to safely move or exchange at least some portion of their fiat currency over to a blockchain architecture to enable its constituents to use blockchain products and participate in blockchain economies which would be impossible with fiat currencies. A government can issue a regulated permissioned currency with all of the architectural advantages of a cryptographic blockchain. There is no requirement for it to be decentralised as is the state with a permissionless blockchain currency. Deciding what features and safeguards a permissioned cryptographic currency should have embedded into its protocol is the more relevant question.
Several first-world central banks have been experimenting with a form of blockchain currency using distributed ledger technology (DLT) for example Canada, Britain and Japan. However they have restricted that usage largely to streamlining interbank financial activities. As important as this is, there should also be a focus to cater directly to end users who want to actively engage in localised economic blockchain activity within the real economy (non-financial). Governments should lead the way and be the conduit to lay down the initial infrastructure for their citizens.
This proposal focuses on first-step distribution being offered directly to the public. The distribution, in all probability, will be taken up via “software developers”, who will require a cryptographic currency to deliver cryptographic blockchain solutions. Such solutions would promise better efficiency within current business models which rely on a high degree of human intervention (for example international money transmittance). These solutions will also drive out friction in antiquated legacy systems and create new forms of value transference not yet thought of. This would enable a meaningful assessment of real-world demand and also allow innovation to be driven directly by the needs of users. Currently, software developers are forced to use permissionless cryptographic tokens/currencies to deliver these products. There would be no need for this if a permissioned government blockchain currency was available.
Any cursory investigation by world governments will confirm the burgeoning wall-to-wall projects underway in this sector. Literally billions of dollars are being invested into this ecosystem. None of these dollars are going into a government-permissioned cryptographic currency. A controlled and measurable pathway is required to apply a blockchain architecture to the national currency. It needs to be done with the buy-in of key stakeholders namely, the government, the banking industry and individual citizens.
This paper provides a starting point as a way forward for the adoption of a cryptographic currency as the correct or better mode of transport to transfer value.
Simply put, an orderly and safe process is needed to introduce a government-issued and controlled cryptographic currency. It would operate in parallel with the fiat system. The key is to implement it with demonstrable incentives to accommodate the key stakeholders. The process would also need to demonstrate low or negligible instability risk to the current financial system.
Specifically a modified CAB (centralised autonomous blockchain) would be created.
The proposal: For the purposes of this proposal I would suggest a country like New Zealand (of which I am a national) would be good candidate. It is a small, first-world economy with a sound and relatively open financial system and would be well suited for such an experiment.
The government, in effect, owns one bank called KiwiBank. In partnership with this central bank the foundation for this proposal is already in place.
The central bank of New Zealand could create a limited quantity of cryptographic currency that would be available for use in parallel with the national fiat currency. Kiwibank would control the initial release of this new currency into the system. This would insure KYC (know your customer) legal requirements and AML (anti money laundering) regulations are met. Kiwibank would in effect provide the on/off ramp into and out of the NZ cryptographic dollar from the NZ fiat dollar.
Since there is no physical note or coin for the new cryptographic currency, converting fiat to cryptographic would be digital only via Kiwibank customers. Customers of Kiwibank would convert monies from their digital fiat bank account and transfer it to a smart-phone digital wallet, using an APP (via Google’s ‘Play Store’). An internal ledger would be created and maintained by Kiwibank for auditing purposes. The government would then know with whom and when the coins were converted.
A Federated Server (or servers) owned and controlled by key stakeholders would be responsible for running the blockchain ledger. The coin would be a New Zealand digital cryptographic dollar (NZCD) and would carry the same value and rights as a New Zealand digital fiat dollar (NZD), backed by the full faith and credit of the New Zealand government).
The initial users who convert their fiat to cryptographic would most probably be software code developers who want to create new blockchain applications for blockchain economies that are accessible only with a cryptographic currency. They would convert their current digital fiat dollars for digital cryptographic dollars. When a new-use application, solution or asset is created, the wider community would then need to convert their fiat dollars for cryptographic dollars to use the new application and participate in the new economy created.
Security and Control: Strong controls can be built into a government-permissioned blockchain currency, together with highly transparent visibility. Regulatory compliance rules could be built in if required, for example: • Freezing the contents of any funds held in any wallet due to criminal activity. • Automated deduction of any funds held in any wallet i.e. outstanding fines (currently forced on employers to collect). • Automatic freezing or confiscation of any funds used on any blacklisted markets. • Automatic recall of funds transferred or used outside a specific geographical location (national or international). In effect, highly advanced controls can be programmed into a cryptographic blockchain currency that is not possible within a fiat system. Cryptographic currencies offer control and flexibility well beyond what a fiat currency is capable of. Lawful activity can be programmed in and unlawful activity can be programmed out.
How? (Basic technical overview): In essence two cryptographic currency tokens would be created. Firstly, a rights token (RST) and secondly a cryptographic currency i.e. a New Zealand cryptographic dollar (NZCD). Both tokens would be created via central-bank/government and would have a symbiotic relationship with each other. The rights token would be tradable, that is to say it would be tradable for legal tender (NZCD) but in itself it would not be legal tender. It would be similar to a share certificate of a company in this respect.
The rights token would receive a dividend from the usage of NZCD. A transaction fee would be deducted and held in escrow each time NZCD was transferred from one entity’s wallet to another to purchase goods and services. This function would be programmed into the blockchain currency and would be automated. For example, the fee could be say 0.1% per transaction (or something set well below any current fiat system fee). Every quarter, transaction fees would be autonomously distributed to all RST token holders on a pro-rata basis at set intervals based on the number of RSTs they own.
RST token: The purpose of an RST is to incentivise and enable key stakeholder participation. It is a new form of ROI (return on investment) for the banking industry. All key stakeholders would benefit from ownership of RSTs. RST ownership could be made transferable or tradeable to qualifying entities or persons and be made divisible to say 8 decimal placings. The 8 decimal placings (the unofficial standard for cryptocurrencies) provides significant depth for a coin to expand its fungibility and allows the token to be highly divisible. Continual price-discovery through market forces would price the token’s actual market value. The initial distribution of RSTs would or could be distributed via a crowd sale to key stakeholders i.e. the banking industry, governments, individuals or other entities.
A very basic example of how this could be implemented is as follows: An initial 10 million RST could be created with a portion then held for auction or for sale. A simple split of the tokens could be: • 2 million held for government or used as incentives for other entities like developers and maintainers of the system. • 4 million held and distributed to all KiwiSaver participants or held in escrow for every Kiwi citizen (KiwiSaver). • 4 million set aside for auction or sale to banks and private New Zealand investors, either all at once or in tranches over time.
NZCD dollar: As little as $1,000,000 dollars could initially be issued. With the above-mentioned built-in safeguards, this level of seed-cryptographic currency would have a negligible impact on the economy. It would allow New Zealand program developers immediate access to start building out new products and economies. As and when demand rose, further NZCDs could be issued.
Incentive for the government: There are a number of incentives for a government to move into this space sooner rather than later. Investment opportunities, economic growth and first-mover advantage are some of them.
In 2015 a record 1 billion dollars’ worth of venture capital was invested into this space, up from 347 million in 2014. Estimates for 2016 are forecast at 5-10 billion dollars. There is more investment being channelled into this space than during the comparative early days of the internet. All of it is virtually walled out by the fiat system. Currently, the only way in or out is via unregulated international private cryptographic coin exchanges. This comes with a high level of friction and risk, which in effect has reduced the cross-border investment primarily to early VC adopters.
Governments would have two clear advantages over other institutions when introducing their own cryptographic currency. The first is legitimacy and the second is immediate stability in line with the national fiat currency. Most permissionless currencies do not have these advantages.
In any event, cryptographic currencies are here to stay. It would be much better for a government, looking forward, to introduce their own cryptographic national currency. This would allow software developers to build out or imbed new emerging cryptographic economies with the nation’s own cryptographic currency.
Key Terms: Rights Token (RST): RSTs reward the owner with transaction fees collected on the system. A reward-based return for any transactional volume will be generated through the use of NZCD Tokens. RST Token ownership would be made transferable or tradeable to qualifying entities or persons and could be divisible to 8 decimal placings.
New Zealand Cryptographic Token (NZCD): An NZCD token represents 1 New Zealand dollar. NZCDs are kept in digital wallets. A set amount would initially be created and grown over time. They have a symbiotic relationship to the RST tokens.
Federated Server (closed system): Servers that run and secure the blockchain. Owned and run by a combination of key stakeholders, banks, a central bank and the government.
ICO: Initial coin offering. A fundraising option to purchase RST tokens.
Crowd sale: Another fundraising option. A crowd sale is used to allow stakeholders to purchase RSTs. Proceeds would be used to fund the system, incentivise stakeholders and attract appropriate developers.
Price per RST: Example: if the crowd sale concludes with a total value of NZ$1,000,000,000 raised, the tokens will be valued at $1,000,000,000/10,000,000 = NZ$100.00 per 1.00000000 RST. 1 RST rewards the holder with transaction fees from NZ cryptographic dollar tokens (NZCDs) on the blockchain at 1 / 10,000,000 of all transaction fees every quarter. As an example transaction fees of NZCD could be set at say 0.1%.
Scenario 1: NZ$1,000 transaction volume per day: The transaction fees collected would be $1,000 * 365 days = 365,000 / 10,000,000 RST tokens. So annual fees collected would be $365 NZCD and distributed pro rata at 0.00003650 cents per 1.00000000 RST held.
Scenario 2: NZ$10,000,000 transaction volume per day: The transaction fees collected would be $10,000,000 * 365 days = 3,650,000,000 / 10,000,000 RST tokens. So annual fees collected would be $3,650,000 NZCD and distributed pro rata at 0.365 cents per 1.00000000 RST held.
Scenario 3: NZ$100,000,000 transaction volume per day: The transaction fees collected would be $100,000,000 * 365 days = 365,000 / 10,000,000 RST tokens. So annual fees collected would be $36,500,000 NZCD and distributed pro rata at $3.65 per 1.00000000 RST held.
About the author: Monty Kirkman is an artist and small business owner. He currently runs a small manufacturing business producing glass art giftware in Whangarei New Zealand
As a keen technologist, in 2013 he discovered the underlying technology called ‘the blockchain’. He became fascinated by the very real disruption this technology will bring to all forms of industry.
One of his aims is to raise awareness to the small business community to prepare themselves for this emerging technology.
submitted by shumbalar to newzealand [link] [comments]

"We now have quantum computers. The Chinese apparently have the fastest. There is D-wave out of BC ... you can break a block chain or Bitcoin password in less than a minute if you have a quantum computer. The question is who is going to have them, and the answer is mainly governments..."

I know some of you read this yesterday, but I think the headline did not highlight the right thing. What should have been news is this former White House representative who was in the US' Working Group on Financial Markets (a.k.a. the "Plunge Protection Team"). She's now in the private sector, talking about governments using quantum computing to seize bitcoin keys.
On The Rise Of Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies and The Fall Of Dollar Hegemony
Moving on, Townsend took the conversation in a direction that he said might be outside of Malmgren’s comfort zone: The rise of cryptocurrency’s like bitcoin. Contrary to his expectations, Malmgren said she’s been closely following the increasing use of cryptocurrencies, adding that they will likely play a role in determining who dominates the global economy, and therefore determines the monetary framework, after precipitating the next big paradigm shift, which will lead the world away from the dollar-based framework that exists today. Governments like China and Russia, which are seeking to create their own digital currencies, pose a greater threat to the long-term dominance of the dollar than they, or the US, realize.
Erik: I want to shift gears now to a topic I didn’t used to think of as being geopolitically oriented, which of course is your area of expertise, and that is crypto currencies. In the beginning, Pippa, if you look at what BitCoin was at the very beginning, it was something only interested extreme Libertarians who were very interested in financial privacy. Nobody else was paying attention to it. It was designed really to usurp the ability of government to interfere with and control people’s finances. It seems that it is almost going through a complete transformation where now we have the Ethereum guy, I forget his name (Vitalik Buterin), meeting with Putin talking about some kind of partnership to create a digital crypto currency that will become a national currency for Russia. Meanwhile, PBOC is advertising to hire block chain engineers to help to design the digital yuan or digital RMB. So all of a sudden, it seems like what’s going on, and I don’t remember the gentleman’s name. But there was someone from PBOC, a very senior official, saying it was time for central banks to stop ignoring crypto currencies and recognize that we have got to take the lead and we have got to be in charge of these things and design what we want them to be. Where is this going? It seems like to me this is a game changer if national governments are going to get behind crypto currencies. Where does this take us?
Later on, she talks more about crypto currencies. I've bolded the really alarming parts.
Pippa: Totally. I think it is a massive market and geopolitical issue. I have written a little article about this, which I put up on LinkedIn, where I said you have got to understand if the size of your debt problem is so big that it can’t be paid off and in fact even inflation, which is the usual way you would seek to default on your debt slowly over time, you can’t get enough inflation generated, then there is one further option. And that is you literally abandon the entire system of money, and accounting. I know that sounds unbelievably radical, but we have seen it happen before. I explained the example of Britain in 1834, when they abandoned the traditional system they had used for 1,000 years at that time, which was called the Tally Stick system. So when we say we tally things up or the word stock market refers to the use of little wooden stocks. They were little pieces of wood on which you record every transaction during your life, every borrowing, every lending deal, every asset acquisition, every tax payment. The way it worked was it was literally a wooden board. You cracked it half really roughly so the two sides definitely did match and couldn’t be faked. Then the borrower and the lender each marked all their transactions. The stock end was always the smaller end, so that’s where we get stock market. There was a market in the stocks, these little wooden sticks. Bottom line was why would you abandon a system that has worked perfectly beautifully for 1,000 years. The answer is you had 200 years of war debts that had accumulated. They were unable to get inflation up enough without causing social unrest, and so the government said hey, let’s take the tally sticks back, and give people this great new innovation called paper money.
You can imagine everyone said I am going to hand over this record, this ledger of my entire net worth, and you are going to give me a piece of paper. Really? This is a joke. In the end, what the government had to do was confiscate the tally sticks, and they took them to parliament to burn them. They misjudged how much heat the fire would throw off, and that is what caused Parliament to burn to the ground in 1834. It was the destruction of the system of accounting and money. In its place, we adopted what we now use, which is piece of paper we call cash. Today, we are on the brink of similar step change, and the way you will do it is you move to electronic money in conjunction with blockchain. Blockchain is the new ledger, and e-money is the new currency.
The question is whose e-money. So everybody in government circles have been watching the Indian experience because the prime minister stepped up to the platform in early November and basically said we are going to move all of you, a billion people, off paper money and onto electronic money, and we are going to do it in three months. They did it, and they did it successfully. Now governments everywhere are saying we want to do that because, guess what happens when you move to e-money. First of all, you really eliminate the black market because you can’t transact anymore without it being seen. And so, for example, the European Union are talking heavily about moving to electronic money because then all this black market activity that happens in Greece and Italy where there’s no tax, we will be able to get all that tax revenue off it. That’s one reason. The second reason is with blockchain you have total transparency over every single step of a transaction, complete providence of every single transaction. The question is who gets to see it. I think this is where governments are suddenly a little schizo because on the one side they think they are going to have the ability to see every transaction that you and I and all the listeners are engaged in, but Ethereum has created this platform where actually they won’t necessarily be in government’s hands, maybe in private hands.
The question is can you trust the private hands who are issuing Ethers as much or more as you trust governments. So governments are being to say let’s create our own version, and that’s where you get the PBOC saying we’ve got to control this. Because otherwise, you are going to end up with private sector currencies that possibly are trusted more than government currencies, and that will lead to transactions offline that governments can’t see. There was a report going around the Internet recently about some guy who made $200 million bucks trading on Ethereum in a month, and the question was who will tax that. The answer is nobody. That freaks governments out to say the least, particularly given their debt situation. So I think this is a huge, huge thing, and all investors have to think very carefully about it. I will say one last thing about it. You have got to get familiar with quantum computing, and there is loads of stuff on the net about it. But the reason it matters is because of the speed at which you can process information. We now have quantum computers. The Chinese apparently have the fastest. There is D-wave out of British Columbia, but basically you can break a block chain password or a Bitcoin password in like less than a minute if you have a quantum computer. The question is who is going to have them, and the answer is mainly governments but big corporations are buying them like crazy. Volkswagen just bought one. We are going to see major corporations buying that computer power.
The question then is who has most transparency over the block chain and e-money, and I would argue it is going to be whoever has the most and fastest processing power, which may be governments at times, it may be private at times, it may be fluid. That’s what we have to think about as investors.
Entire article
submitted by CookyDough to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

From refugee to citizen. (HELP appreciated)

Dears reddit community, I try to apologize in advance for my english it is not my native language. I tried posting this on bitcoin but it got deleted right away which is kinda sad for me. Maybe dogecoin dogecoinbeg is open minded for my story mind this is a copypasta from my post before. Cause my threads get deleted because my account is NEW which is a logic term if people are trying to scam
Im trying my best to explain the situation and my journey. My name is Mussad I was born on 1st March in 1992 and im a refugee.
Its quite a hard task for me to write about the past and everything I went through to be the person iam today. (Lets not forget I keep the details to a minimum but this is still going to be a long post)
As stated before im a refugee and came with the second huge wave and different transportation ways all the way from my home country to Turkey, Greece, over Italy and Austria finally to my current destination Germany (that was back then when you still could relatively easy cross these borders).
Im thankful for every kind person around here in germany and thankful to have a breakfeast and a warm meal as well as shelter everyday. Somethings are really bothersome (like racists and differnece in skin) but people are nice and kind and im grateful for every bit of help to enjoy the next day.
The thing is as you may or may not know as a refugee you cant get work quite easily for money to pay for your own. Im not ranting about it cause this is just how things work out in this country and I accept it even if it puts me in a bad space.
So currently im trying to accumulate some EUROS to cover some extra expenses and make the best out of my personal time by reading, enjoying trips to the local sea, doing some gardening for my household family or even just going around aimlessly to explore the location and maybe find some empty bottles to pick them up and return it to the local store for exchange.
I already came in contact before the refugee crisis with Dogecoin or several Altcoins and Bitcoins as well back in 2010 or something with a still affordable price.
I have a strong believe in cryptocurrencys outside of all the things erupting the planet this is the way to go for independence and seperation from the banking sector. First I labeled it as kind of a pyramide scam but the last couple of weeks made my mind think about it in a complete different way.
Since I pointed before that im still not allowed to pick up a regular job and start earning money by my own I try my best to take some of my own money by exchanging empty bottles to invest into cryptocurrencys.
Mind you these are just a few dimes and pennys but if you truly believe in it, it might change the world and mine aswell.
So I came to the idea to start trying to gain some mBTC by a wonderful community to get me out of this misery and after that help the people who helped me and my loved ones. The thing is people around here even trying to help you not with money but with small stuff as well like I can get some free eggs every day to cook delicious breakfeast.
So im straight to you and want to help myself and others out and give something to the community here back by raising funds and selling these bitcoins to spend some money for various things to support the region I live in.
Feel free to donate spare bitcoins to the following adress I created.
**BTC Adress: 1EacQSfrKa9at7j3LCsDn2b9kSeQe8g6b7
**DOGE Adress: D8bTFAJnoxWHXQTRcyiogvFXijcjL6arhs
If you wanna support me through other ways/coins please let me know so i can generate a adress!
After all the most precious thing for me is to find my girlfriend and 2-year old son that got seperated from me by fleeing from my home country. THIS IS MY GREATEST WISH ON EARTH to take them back in my arms again and saying I LOVE YOU and maybe once return back to home.
So now im going to catch the last sunshines from today maybe play some soccer at the park then take a quick shower and enjoy one of my favourite TV Shows Die SImpsons always airing at 6o`clock and trying my best to learn german to keep the language-barriers to a minimum.
Then get some rest and start a new day. Maybe I wake up to a small miracle I still have a strong view about attitude and karma.
Thanks for your attention. Lets make this world better with every day!
-Mussad A.
Im pretty afraid people going to do bad stuff if you put things on the internet so I give you a picture-in-picture of me.
submitted by mussadronaldo92 to dogecoinbeg [link] [comments]

[request] support immigrants,refugee rights and #postnationalism for a united globe

*I'm new to /Assistance/ but I'm not new to supporting immigrants and refugees of ALL stripes. #postnationalism is for people who look past their country of birth to a 'united' globe.
Looking around the world it seems that almost everywhere nationalism is on the rise. In the US polling shows the Tea Party movement supported by a third of Americans, and a major belief of the Tea Party is anti-immigration. In this years European elections the Eurosceptic EFDD alliance had almost 11 million votes despite running in only 7 countries. France's EU election had the Front National take home the most seats. Golden Dawn was the party that received the third most votes in Greece. In this year's Swedish election the ultra-nationalism Sweden Democrats finished with the third highest seat count. In this year's Hungarian election Jobbik received 20% of the popular vote. Of course there was the Scottish referendum which came with 6% of having a Yes victory.
And there is the ongoing war in the Ukraine demonstrating both Ukrainian and Russian nationalism. Than there is the remilitarization of Japan showing that this is not just a European phenomena. (mods excuse me if this is politics but it's more like charity for the weakest among us, the lowly migrant worker.)
TLDR; Support migrant workers, Donate Bitcoin:
(or come help out at /postnationalist)
submitted by PostNationalism to Assistance [link] [comments]

Iraqi Kurds At Greek-Macedonian Border Harrowing first-hand account of refugees landing on Lesvos, Greece. FreeManCast: Idomeni and Refugee Integration Syrians Protesting At Greek-Macedonian Border Thousands Of Refugees Stranded At Greek-Macedonian Border As EU Strikes Deal With Turkey

Coinbase is still going strong with its “12 Days of Coinbase”, a twist on the popular refrain and song, “12 Days Of Christmas”. It appears as though this is another announcement in conjunction with GiveCrypto, a nonprofit that seeks to distribute cryptocurrency to those in need as quickly and efficiently as possible. How It Works... One of such services is the donation of $10,000 worth of Bitcoin to 150 Syrian refugees in Greece. Bitcoin Donation to Syrian Refugees to Aid Easy Access to Funds. and Sempo, are two platforms that have partnered with Coinbase to ensure that refugees can get quick access to funds. This is due to the level of difficulty these people face before they can gain access to financial ... NotAFactory is a Greece-based brand new startup that makes t-shirts. But you would be dead wrong if you take it for just another online t-shirt shop. NotAFactory is, by design, an empowering platform for refugees from war-torn Syria who took… Continue reading A Greece Startup Helping Syrian Refugees Earn Livelihood is Now Accepting Bitcoin Coinbase and GiveCrypto Collaborates To Help Syrian Refugees in Greece. Posted by Miroslav Stojanovikj. Coinbase is running solid with its “12 Days of Coinbase”, a curve on the mainstream abstinence and tune, “12 Days Of Christmas.” It seems like this is another declaration related to GiveCrypto, a philanthropic company that tries to disseminate cryptographic money to those in need as ... Day 6- Bitcoin donation for Syrian refugees: Coinbase donated $10,000 in BTC to Syrian refugees living in Greece via GiveCrypto. Day 7- Coinbase educates users on USDC: TCoinbase talked about its first stablecoin listing, USDC, a Circle-backed cryptocurrency pegged to the US Dollar 1:1. Day 8- Enables direct crypto conversions:

[index] [47678] [29784] [29941] [6878] [39904] [7855] [50306] [2607] [15710] [19833]

Iraqi Kurds At Greek-Macedonian Border

Filmed March 20, 2016 Subscribe to this channel: Also follow me on: Steemit: @freemanreporter Twitter: @freemanreporter Instagram... Syrian refugees lie on the train tracks outside Idomeni, Greece in protest of European leaders closing the Greek-Macedonian border. Filmed March 20, 2016 Thousands of Refugees Stranded at Greek ... The podcast offers a critical look at the refugees arriving in Europe. Josh Friedman is joined by Brent Sanders to discuss a recent trip to Idomeni and the Greek-Macedonian border. Recorded on ... In my third film, I travel to the North of Turkey to witness the refugee crisis at the border with Greece. In late February, Russian and Syrian forces continued their bombing campaign in Idlib. Since spring 2015 over 60,000 refugees have come ashore near the home of Philippa and Eric Kempson in Lesvos, Greece. Without government help, the couple and friends have been helping the refugees.